The "+" operation has higher precedence than "?:" and ->msi_cap is
always non-zero here so the original statement is equivalent to:
entry->mask_pos = PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
Which wasn't the intent.
[bhelgaas: my fault from
78b5a310ce]
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; /* Save IOAPIC IRQ */
entry->msi_attrib.pos = dev->msi_cap;
- entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) ?
- PCI_MSI_MASK_64 : PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
+ if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT)
+ entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64;
+ else
+ entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_32;
/* All MSIs are unmasked by default, Mask them all */
if (entry->msi_attrib.maskbit)
pci_read_config_dword(dev, entry->mask_pos, &entry->masked);