There is no reason for run_sema to be a struct semaphore. Changing
it to a mutex and rename it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@de.ibm.com>
spin_lock_init(&ctx->mapping_lock);
kref_init(&ctx->kref);
mutex_init(&ctx->state_mutex);
- init_MUTEX(&ctx->run_sema);
+ mutex_init(&ctx->run_mutex);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->ibox_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wbox_wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->stop_wq);
int ret;
u32 status;
- if (down_interruptible(&ctx->run_sema))
+ if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&ctx->run_mutex))
return -ERESTARTSYS;
ctx->ops->master_start(ctx);
out:
*event = ctx->event_return;
- up(&ctx->run_sema);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctx->run_mutex);
return ret;
}
enum { SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE, SPU_STATE_SAVED } state;
struct mutex state_mutex;
- struct semaphore run_sema;
+ struct mutex run_mutex;
struct mm_struct *owner;