net/rose: Use GFP_ATOMIC

The other calls to kmalloc in the same function use GFP_ATOMIC, and indeed
two locks are held within the body of the function.

The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@ identifier f; @@

*f(...,GFP_ATOMIC,...)
... when != spin_unlock(...)
    when != read_unlock(...)
    when != write_unlock(...)
    when != read_unlock_irq(...)
    when != write_unlock_irq(...)
    when != read_unlock_irqrestore(...)
    when != write_unlock_irqrestore(...)
    when != spin_unlock_irq(...)
    when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(...)
*f(...,GFP_KERNEL,...)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
index cbc244a128bd1611829f6e943ae7a669cc81f2d3..b4fdaac233f77ec3dbe4bd86b0f8d5bc178bb9f7 100644 (file)
--- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
@@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ static int __must_check rose_add_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route,
                init_timer(&rose_neigh->t0timer);
 
                if (rose_route->ndigis != 0) {
-                       if ((rose_neigh->digipeat = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) {
+                       rose_neigh->digipeat =
+                               kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_ATOMIC);
+                       if (rose_neigh->digipeat == NULL) {
                                kfree(rose_neigh);
                                res = -ENOMEM;
                                goto out;