raid5: get_active_stripe avoids device_lock
authorShaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 03:27:42 +0000 (11:27 +0800)
committerNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:42:42 +0000 (14:42 +1000)
For sequential workload (or request size big workload), get_active_stripe can
find cached stripe. In this case, we always hold device_lock, which exposes a
lot of lock contention for such workload. If stripe count isn't 0, we don't
need hold the lock actually, since we just increase its count. And this is the
hot code path for such workload. Unfortunately we must delete the BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
drivers/md/raid5.c

index a904a2c80fc83fc5651fe7f26ed37cd40bb37224..25247a8529124f7cc93eda0db7033655d52f2ef7 100644 (file)
@@ -679,14 +679,9 @@ get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
                                init_stripe(sh, sector, previous);
                                atomic_inc(&sh->count);
                        }
-               } else {
+               } else if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count)) {
                        spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
-                       if (atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
-                               BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sh->lru)
-                                   && !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state)
-                                   && !test_bit(STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST, &sh->state)
-                                       );
-                       } else {
+                       if (!atomic_read(&sh->count)) {
                                if (!test_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state))
                                        atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
                                BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&