When commit
b554e1450658 ("regulator: tps65917/palmas: Add bypass
ops for LDOs with bypass capability") introduced bypass capability
to palmas regulator, it went with the assumption that regulator
regmap helpers just check val against the bypass_mask.
Unfortunately, this ignored the explicit "on" and "off" values when
the register value is masked with bypass_mask in commit
ca5d1b3524b4
("regulator: helpers: Modify helpers enabling multi-bit control").
With the recent commit
dd1a571daee7 ("regulator: helpers: Ensure
bypass register field matches ON value"), this issue gets highlighted
and fails tps65917/palmas based platforms which need regulators/ldos
that have bypass capability.
Introduce the bypass_on value appropriately for tps65917/palmas
regulator.
Fixes:
b554e1450658 ("regulator: tps65917/palmas: Add bypass ops for LDOs with bypass capability")
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
if (id == PALMAS_REG_LDO9) {
desc->ops = &palmas_ops_ldo9;
desc->bypass_reg = desc->enable_reg;
+ desc->bypass_val_on =
+ PALMAS_LDO9_CTRL_LDO_BYPASS_EN;
desc->bypass_mask =
PALMAS_LDO9_CTRL_LDO_BYPASS_EN;
}
id == TPS65917_REG_LDO2) {
desc->ops = &tps65917_ops_ldo_1_2;
desc->bypass_reg = desc->enable_reg;
+ desc->bypass_val_on =
+ TPS65917_LDO1_CTRL_BYPASS_EN;
desc->bypass_mask =
TPS65917_LDO1_CTRL_BYPASS_EN;
}
desc->enable_mask = SMPS10_BOOST_EN;
desc->bypass_reg = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_SMPS_BASE,
PALMAS_SMPS10_CTRL);
+ desc->bypass_val_on = SMPS10_BYPASS_EN;
desc->bypass_mask = SMPS10_BYPASS_EN;
desc->min_uV = 3750000;
desc->uV_step = 1250000;