sched: Avoid going ahead if ->cpus_allowed is not changed
authorYong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Mon, 9 May 2011 14:07:05 +0000 (22:07 +0800)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Mon, 16 May 2011 09:01:18 +0000 (11:01 +0200)
If cpumask_equal(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask) is true, seems
there is no reason to prevent set_cpus_allowed_ptr() return
directly.

Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110509140705.GA2219@zhy
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
kernel/sched.c

index b8b9a7dac9b069e04a53f4cf3244eed0db4375bd..70bec4f1edbb9213f943e4434a26c5a3fbe2b153 100644 (file)
@@ -5946,13 +5946,15 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
 
        rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
 
+       if (cpumask_equal(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask))
+               goto out;
+
        if (!cpumask_intersects(new_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out;
        }
 
-       if (unlikely((p->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND) && p != current &&
-                    !cpumask_equal(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask))) {
+       if (unlikely((p->flags & PF_THREAD_BOUND) && p != current)) {
                ret = -EINVAL;
                goto out;
        }