}
}
+static inline int overlaps(sector_t s1, int l1, sector_t s2, int l2)
+{
+ return !((s1 + (l1>>9) <= s2) || (s1 >= s2 + (l2>>9)));
+}
+
+/* maybe change sync_ee into interval trees as well? */
+static bool overlaping_resync_write(struct drbd_conf *mdev, struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req)
+{
+ struct drbd_peer_request *rs_req;
+ bool rv = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&mdev->tconn->req_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(rs_req, &mdev->sync_ee, w.list) {
+ if (overlaps(peer_req->i.sector, peer_req->i.size,
+ rs_req->i.sector, rs_req->i.size)) {
+ rv = 1;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irq(&mdev->tconn->req_lock);
+
+ if (rv)
+ dev_warn(DEV, "WARN: Avoiding concurrent data/resync write to single sector.\n");
+
+ return rv;
+}
+
/* Called from receive_Data.
* Synchronize packets on sock with packets on msock.
*
list_add(&peer_req->w.list, &mdev->active_ee);
spin_unlock_irq(&mdev->tconn->req_lock);
+ if (mdev->state.conn == C_SYNC_TARGET)
+ wait_event(mdev->ee_wait, !overlaping_resync_write(mdev, peer_req));
+
if (mdev->tconn->agreed_pro_version < 100) {
rcu_read_lock();
switch (rcu_dereference(mdev->tconn->net_conf)->wire_protocol) {