int memcg_update_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s, int num_groups);
void memcg_update_array_size(int num_groups);
+
+struct kmem_cache *
+__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp);
+
/**
* memcg_kmem_newpage_charge: verify if a new kmem allocation is allowed.
* @gfp: the gfp allocation flags.
__memcg_kmem_commit_charge(page, memcg, order);
}
+/**
+ * memcg_kmem_get_cache: selects the correct per-memcg cache for allocation
+ * @cachep: the original global kmem cache
+ * @gfp: allocation flags.
+ *
+ * This function assumes that the task allocating, which determines the memcg
+ * in the page allocator, belongs to the same cgroup throughout the whole
+ * process. Misacounting can happen if the task calls memcg_kmem_get_cache()
+ * while belonging to a cgroup, and later on changes. This is considered
+ * acceptable, and should only happen upon task migration.
+ *
+ * Before the cache is created by the memcg core, there is also a possible
+ * imbalance: the task belongs to a memcg, but the cache being allocated from
+ * is the global cache, since the child cache is not yet guaranteed to be
+ * ready. This case is also fine, since in this case the GFP_KMEMCG will not be
+ * passed and the page allocator will not attempt any cgroup accounting.
+ */
+static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ if (!memcg_kmem_enabled())
+ return cachep;
+ if (gfp & __GFP_NOFAIL)
+ return cachep;
+ if (in_interrupt() || (!current->mm) || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+ return cachep;
+ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+ return cachep;
+
+ return __memcg_kmem_get_cache(cachep, gfp);
+}
#else
static inline bool
memcg_kmem_newpage_charge(gfp_t gfp, struct mem_cgroup **memcg, int order)
struct kmem_cache *s)
{
}
+
+static inline struct kmem_cache *
+memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ return cachep;
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
#endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
#define MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE 4
#define MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE 65535
+/*
+ * A lot of the calls to the cache allocation functions are expected to be
+ * inlined by the compiler. Since the calls to memcg_kmem_get_cache are
+ * conditional to this static branch, we'll have to allow modules that does
+ * kmem_cache_alloc and the such to see this symbol as well
+ */
struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
static void disarm_kmem_keys(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
void memcg_release_cache(struct kmem_cache *s)
{
+ struct kmem_cache *root;
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+ int id;
+
+ /*
+ * This happens, for instance, when a root cache goes away before we
+ * add any memcg.
+ */
+ if (!s->memcg_params)
+ return;
+
+ if (s->memcg_params->is_root_cache)
+ goto out;
+
+ memcg = s->memcg_params->memcg;
+ id = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+
+ root = s->memcg_params->root_cache;
+ root->memcg_params->memcg_caches[id] = NULL;
+ mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
+
+ mutex_lock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
+ list_del(&s->memcg_params->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg->slab_caches_mutex);
+
+out:
kfree(s->memcg_params);
}
+static char *memcg_cache_name(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct kmem_cache *s)
+{
+ char *name;
+ struct dentry *dentry;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dentry = rcu_dereference(memcg->css.cgroup->dentry);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ BUG_ON(dentry == NULL);
+
+ name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s(%d:%s)", s->name,
+ memcg_cache_id(memcg), dentry->d_name.name);
+
+ return name;
+}
+
+static struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_dup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct kmem_cache *s)
+{
+ char *name;
+ struct kmem_cache *new;
+
+ name = memcg_cache_name(memcg, s);
+ if (!name)
+ return NULL;
+
+ new = kmem_cache_create_memcg(memcg, name, s->object_size, s->align,
+ (s->flags & ~SLAB_PANIC), s->ctor);
+
+ kfree(name);
+ return new;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This lock protects updaters, not readers. We want readers to be as fast as
+ * they can, and they will either see NULL or a valid cache value. Our model
+ * allow them to see NULL, in which case the root memcg will be selected.
+ *
+ * We need this lock because multiple allocations to the same cache from a non
+ * will span more than one worker. Only one of them can create the cache.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_cache_mutex);
+static struct kmem_cache *memcg_create_kmem_cache(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct kmem_cache *cachep)
+{
+ struct kmem_cache *new_cachep;
+ int idx;
+
+ BUG_ON(!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg));
+
+ idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+
+ mutex_lock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
+ new_cachep = cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+ if (new_cachep)
+ goto out;
+
+ new_cachep = kmem_cache_dup(memcg, cachep);
+
+ if (new_cachep == NULL) {
+ new_cachep = cachep;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ mem_cgroup_get(memcg);
+ new_cachep->memcg_params->root_cache = cachep;
+
+ cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] = new_cachep;
+ /*
+ * the readers won't lock, make sure everybody sees the updated value,
+ * so they won't put stuff in the queue again for no reason
+ */
+ wmb();
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&memcg_cache_mutex);
+ return new_cachep;
+}
+
+struct create_work {
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+ struct kmem_cache *cachep;
+ struct work_struct work;
+};
+
+static void memcg_create_cache_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
+{
+ struct create_work *cw;
+
+ cw = container_of(w, struct create_work, work);
+ memcg_create_kmem_cache(cw->memcg, cw->cachep);
+ /* Drop the reference gotten when we enqueued. */
+ css_put(&cw->memcg->css);
+ kfree(cw);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Enqueue the creation of a per-memcg kmem_cache.
+ * Called with rcu_read_lock.
+ */
+static void memcg_create_cache_enqueue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ struct kmem_cache *cachep)
+{
+ struct create_work *cw;
+
+ cw = kmalloc(sizeof(struct create_work), GFP_NOWAIT);
+ if (cw == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ /* The corresponding put will be done in the workqueue. */
+ if (!css_tryget(&memcg->css)) {
+ kfree(cw);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ cw->memcg = memcg;
+ cw->cachep = cachep;
+
+ INIT_WORK(&cw->work, memcg_create_cache_work_func);
+ schedule_work(&cw->work);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Return the kmem_cache we're supposed to use for a slab allocation.
+ * We try to use the current memcg's version of the cache.
+ *
+ * If the cache does not exist yet, if we are the first user of it,
+ * we either create it immediately, if possible, or create it asynchronously
+ * in a workqueue.
+ * In the latter case, we will let the current allocation go through with
+ * the original cache.
+ *
+ * Can't be called in interrupt context or from kernel threads.
+ * This function needs to be called with rcu_read_lock() held.
+ */
+struct kmem_cache *__memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
+ gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+ int idx;
+
+ VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params);
+ VM_BUG_ON(!cachep->memcg_params->is_root_cache);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(current->mm->owner));
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (!memcg_can_account_kmem(memcg))
+ return cachep;
+
+ idx = memcg_cache_id(memcg);
+
+ /*
+ * barrier to mare sure we're always seeing the up to date value. The
+ * code updating memcg_caches will issue a write barrier to match this.
+ */
+ read_barrier_depends();
+ if (unlikely(cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx] == NULL)) {
+ /*
+ * If we are in a safe context (can wait, and not in interrupt
+ * context), we could be be predictable and return right away.
+ * This would guarantee that the allocation being performed
+ * already belongs in the new cache.
+ *
+ * However, there are some clashes that can arrive from locking.
+ * For instance, because we acquire the slab_mutex while doing
+ * kmem_cache_dup, this means no further allocation could happen
+ * with the slab_mutex held.
+ *
+ * Also, because cache creation issue get_online_cpus(), this
+ * creates a lock chain: memcg_slab_mutex -> cpu_hotplug_mutex,
+ * that ends up reversed during cpu hotplug. (cpuset allocates
+ * a bunch of GFP_KERNEL memory during cpuup). Due to all that,
+ * better to defer everything.
+ */
+ memcg_create_cache_enqueue(memcg, cachep);
+ return cachep;
+ }
+
+ return cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[idx];
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__memcg_kmem_get_cache);
+
/*
* We need to verify if the allocation against current->mm->owner's memcg is
* possible for the given order. But the page is not allocated yet, so we'll
projects / GitHub / exynos8895 / android_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git / commitdiff