The previous patch, http://review.whamcloud.com/21304/, removed
a check needed until LU-5718 is properly addressed. With
the check, LU-5718 results in an error message and a lost
RDMA operation. Without it, we have memory corruption and
a crash (much harder to debug).
Putting the check back in case LU-5718 is not fixed soon.
Signed-off-by: Doug Oucharek <doug.s.oucharek@intel.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7650
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/22281
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Olaf Weber <olaf@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
break;
}
+ if (tx->tx_nwrq >= IBLND_MAX_RDMA_FRAGS) {
+ CERROR("RDMA has too many fragments for peer %s (%d), src idx/frags: %d/%d dst idx/frags: %d/%d\n",
+ libcfs_nid2str(conn->ibc_peer->ibp_nid),
+ IBLND_MAX_RDMA_FRAGS,
+ srcidx, srcrd->rd_nfrags,
+ dstidx, dstrd->rd_nfrags);
+ rc = -EMSGSIZE;
+ break;
+ }
+
wrknob = min(min(kiblnd_rd_frag_size(srcrd, srcidx),
kiblnd_rd_frag_size(dstrd, dstidx)),
(__u32)resid);