Fix all checkpatch reported issues for "CHECK: Prefer
kzalloc(sizeof(*<p>)...) over kzalloc(sizeof(struct <P>)...)".
Other similar case in the code already using recommended style, so make
it all consistent with the recommended practice.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Silva <rjpdasilva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
/* Use a single struct IR instance for both the Rx and Tx functions */
ir = get_ir_device_by_adapter(adap);
if (!ir) {
- ir = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ir = kzalloc(sizeof(*ir), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ir) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_no_ir;
rx = get_ir_rx(ir);
/* Set up a struct IR_tx instance */
- tx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR_tx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ tx = kzalloc(sizeof(*tx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_xx;
tx = get_ir_tx(ir);
/* Set up a struct IR_rx instance */
- rx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct IR_rx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ rx = kzalloc(sizeof(*rx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rx) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_xx;