commit
c8195a7b1ad5648857ce20ba24f384faed8512bc upstream.
Until v4.14, this warning was very infrequent:
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18172 at fs/btrfs/backref.c:1391 find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
Modules linked in: [...]
CPU: 3 PID: 18172 Comm: bees Tainted: G D W L 4.11.9-zb64+ #1
Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M5A78L-M/USB3, BIOS 2101 12/02/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc2
__warn+0xd1/0xf0
warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
find_parent_nodes+0xc41/0x14e0
__btrfs_find_all_roots+0xad/0x120
? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
iterate_extent_inodes+0x168/0x300
iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xb0
? extent_same_check_offsets+0x70/0x70
btrfs_ioctl+0x8ac/0x2820
? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x200
do_vfs_ioctl+0x91/0x700
? __fget+0x112/0x200
SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0x140
Starting with v4.14 (specifically
86d5f9944252 ("btrfs: convert prelimary
reference tracking to use rbtrees")) the WARN_ON occurs three orders of
magnitude more frequently--almost once per second while running workloads
like bees.
Replace the WARN_ON() with a comment rationale for its removal.
The rationale is paraphrased from an explanation by Edmund Nadolski
<enadolski@suse.de> on the linux-btrfs mailing list.
Fixes:
8da6d5815c59 ("Btrfs: added btrfs_find_all_roots()")
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
while (node) {
ref = rb_entry(node, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
node = rb_next(&ref->rbnode);
- WARN_ON(ref->count < 0);
+ /*
+ * ref->count < 0 can happen here if there are delayed
+ * refs with a node->action of BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF.
+ * prelim_ref_insert() relies on this when merging
+ * identical refs to keep the overall count correct.
+ * prelim_ref_insert() will merge only those refs
+ * which compare identically. Any refs having
+ * e.g. different offsets would not be merged,
+ * and would retain their original ref->count < 0.
+ */
if (roots && ref->count && ref->root_id && ref->parent == 0) {
if (sc && sc->root_objectid &&
ref->root_id != sc->root_objectid) {