We were bailing out after the first count mismatch, do it in all to see
if only some CPUs are not getting the expected number of events.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
goto out_close_fd;
}
+ err = 0;
+
for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus->nr; ++cpu) {
unsigned int expected;
if (perf_evsel__read_on_cpu(evsel, cpu, 0) < 0) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__open_read_on_cpu\n");
- goto out_close_fd;
+ err = -1;
+ break;
}
expected = nr_open_calls + cpu;
if (evsel->counts->cpu[cpu].val != expected) {
pr_debug("perf_evsel__read_on_cpu: expected to intercept %d calls on cpu %d, got %" PRIu64 "\n",
expected, cpus->map[cpu], evsel->counts->cpu[cpu].val);
- goto out_close_fd;
+ err = -1;
}
}
- err = 0;
out_close_fd:
perf_evsel__close_fd(evsel, 1, threads->nr);
out_evsel_delete: