This patch fixes a bug which was introduced by:
b16a5b52eb90 ("perf/x86: Add option to disable reading branch flags/cycles")
In this patch, lbr_sel_mask is used to mask the lbr_select. But LBR_SEL_MASK
doesn't include the bit for LBR_CALL_STACK. So LBR call stack will never be
set in lbr_select.
This patch corrects the LBR_SEL_MASK by including all valid bits in
LBR_SELECT. Also, the LBR_CALL_STACK bit is different as other bit in
LBR_SELECT. It does not operate in suppress mode, so it needs to be
specially handled in intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461231010-4399-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
#define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
-#define LBR_SEL_MASK 0x1ff /* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+#define LBR_SEL_MASK 0x3ff /* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
#define LBR_NOT_SUPP -1 /* LBR filter not supported */
#define LBR_IGN 0 /* ignored */
* The first 9 bits (LBR_SEL_MASK) in LBR_SELECT operate
* in suppress mode. So LBR_SELECT should be set to
* (~mask & LBR_SEL_MASK) | (mask & ~LBR_SEL_MASK)
+ * But the 10th bit LBR_CALL_STACK does not operate
+ * in suppress mode.
*/
- reg->config = mask ^ x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask;
+ reg->config = mask ^ (x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask & ~LBR_CALL_STACK);
if ((br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES) &&
(br_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS) &&