Back when pci_dev had base_address[], loop of form
base = &...->base_address[0];
for (.....) {
...
*base++ = addr;
}
was fine, but when that array got spread in ->resource[...].start
replacing the initialization with
base = &...->resource[0].start;
was not a sufficient modification. IOW this code got broken for cases
when there had been more than one resource to fill. All way back in
2.3.41-pre3...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct pcidev_cookie *cookie;
struct device_node *dp;
- unsigned long addr, *base;
+ struct resource *p;
unsigned short pci_command;
int len, reg, nreg;
int num_ebus = 0;
}
nreg = len / sizeof(struct linux_prom_pci_registers);
- base = &ebus->self->resource[0].start;
+ p = &ebus->self->resource[0];
for (reg = 0; reg < nreg; reg++) {
if (!(regs[reg].which_io & 0x03000000))
continue;
- addr = regs[reg].phys_lo;
- *base++ = addr;
+ (p++)->start = regs[reg].phys_lo;
}
ebus->ofdev.node = dp;