The name of the mutex written in comment is wrong. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* across the pages in a mapping.
*
* The region data structures are protected by a combination of the mmap_sem
- * and the hugetlb_instantion_mutex. To access or modify a region the caller
+ * and the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex. To access or modify a region the caller
* must either hold the mmap_sem for write, or the mmap_sem for read and
- * the hugetlb_instantiation mutex:
+ * the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex:
*
* down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
* or