The block in sys_swapon which does the final adjustments to the
swap_info_struct and to swap_list is the same as the block which
re-inserts it again at sys_swapoff on failure of try_to_unuse(), except
for the order of the operations within the lock. Since the order should
not matter, arbitrarily change sys_swapoff to match sys_swapon, in
preparation to making both share the same code.
Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
Tested-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Acked-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
spin_lock(&swap_lock);
if (p->prio < 0)
p->prio = --least_priority;
+ p->flags |= SWP_WRITEOK;
+ nr_swap_pages += p->pages;
+ total_swap_pages += p->pages;
+
prev = -1;
for (i = swap_list.head; i >= 0; i = swap_info[i]->next) {
if (p->prio >= swap_info[i]->prio)
swap_list.head = swap_list.next = type;
else
swap_info[prev]->next = type;
- nr_swap_pages += p->pages;
- total_swap_pages += p->pages;
- p->flags |= SWP_WRITEOK;
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
goto out_dput;
}