Thomas claims that irqs are disabled when set_next_event is called. But
David and Remy claim they saw irqs being enabled here. As both sides
don't seem to have time to investigate here, start with a warning that
might trigger if the problem still exists.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-By: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
Acked-By: Remy Bohmer <linux@bohmer.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
/* Use "raw" primitives so we behave correctly on RT kernels. */
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ /*
+ * According to Thomas Gleixner irqs are already disabled here. Simply
+ * removing raw_local_irq_save above (and the matching
+ * raw_local_irq_restore) was not accepted. See
+ * http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/41174
+ * So for now (2008-11-20) just warn once if irqs were not disabled ...
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags));
+
/* The alarm IRQ uses absolute time (now+delta), not the relative
* time (delta) in our calling convention. Like all clockevents
* using such "match" hardware, we have a race to defend against.