Ingo noticed that using signed arithmetic seems to confuse the gcc
inliner, and make it potentially decide that it's all too complicated.
(Yeah, yeah, it's a constant. It's always positive. Still..)
Based-on: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
return oldbit;
}
-static inline int constant_test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr)
+static inline int constant_test_bit(unsigned int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr)
{
return ((1UL << (nr % BITS_PER_LONG)) &
(((unsigned long *)addr)[nr / BITS_PER_LONG])) != 0;