Some comments misspell "truly"; this fixes them. No code changes.
Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
void generate_random_uuid(unsigned char uuid_out[16])
{
get_random_bytes(uuid_out, 16);
- /* Set UUID version to 4 --- truely random generation */
+ /* Set UUID version to 4 --- truly random generation */
uuid_out[6] = (uuid_out[6] & 0x0F) | 0x40;
/* Set the UUID variant to DCE */
uuid_out[8] = (uuid_out[8] & 0x3F) | 0x80;
/* judging by the first tile offset needed, could possibly
directly address/clear 4x4 tiles instead of 8x2 * 4x4
macro tiles, though would still need clear mask for
- right/bottom if truely 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
+ right/bottom if truly 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
OUT_RING(tileoffset * 16);
/* the number of tiles to clear */
OUT_RING(nrtilesx + 1);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SH_HICOSH4
- /* truely reset the chip */
+ /* truly reset the chip */
writeword(ioaddr, ADD_PORT, 0x0114);
writeword(ioaddr, DATA_PORT, 0x0040);
#endif
/*
* This in_recovery lock does two things:
* 1) Keeps this function from returning until all threads are out
- * of locking routines and locking is truely stopped.
+ * of locking routines and locking is truly stopped.
* 2) Keeps any new requests from being processed until it's unlocked
* when recovery is complete.
*/
* e) conversion from fhandle to dentry may come in the wrong moment - when
* we are removing the target. Solution: we will have to grab ->i_mutex
* in the fhandle_to_dentry code. [FIXME - current nfsfh.c relies on
- * ->i_mutex on parents, which works but leads to some truely excessive
+ * ->i_mutex on parents, which works but leads to some truly excessive
* locking].
*/
static int vfs_rename_dir(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
_FP_FRAC_DECL_##wc(X)
/*
- * Finish truely unpacking a native fp value by classifying the kind
+ * Finish truly unpacking a native fp value by classifying the kind
* of fp value and normalizing both the exponent and the fraction.
*/
* @buffer: The ring buffer to enable writes
*
* Note, multiple disables will need the same number of enables
- * to truely enable the writing (much like preempt_disable).
+ * to truly enable the writing (much like preempt_disable).
*/
void ring_buffer_record_enable(struct ring_buffer *buffer)
{
* @cpu: The CPU to enable.
*
* Note, multiple disables will need the same number of enables
- * to truely enable the writing (much like preempt_disable).
+ * to truly enable the writing (much like preempt_disable).
*/
void ring_buffer_record_enable_cpu(struct ring_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
{