drm/i915: Additional request structure tracing
authorJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:49:36 +0000 (13:49 +0000)
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Sat, 6 Dec 2014 00:46:27 +0000 (01:46 +0100)
Added the request structure's 'uniq' identifier to the trace information. Also
renamed the '_complete' trace event to '_notify' as it actually happens in the
IRQ 'notify_ring()' function. The intention is to add a new '_complete' trace
event which occurs when a request structure is actually marked as complete.
However, at the moment the completion status is re-tested every time the query
is made so there isn't a completion event as such.

v2: New patch added to series.

v3: Rebased to remove completion caching as that is apparently contentious.

Change-Id: Ic9bcde67d175c6c03b96217cdcb6e4cc4aa45d67
For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h

index 7913a72ce30ac0dcd775ab44be239c48bd0e3048..08a5a4ba52acd027c27e5559539593f283ad0cc3 100644 (file)
@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ static void notify_ring(struct drm_device *dev,
        if (!intel_ring_initialized(ring))
                return;
 
-       trace_i915_gem_request_complete(ring);
+       trace_i915_gem_request_notify(ring);
 
        wake_up_all(&ring->irq_queue);
 }
index 2ade958f28f8358432130888bf1095b83fde49e5..6058a01b444334472d7023661bb6a37b551dbf1c 100644 (file)
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
            TP_STRUCT__entry(
                             __field(u32, dev)
                             __field(u32, ring)
+                            __field(u32, uniq)
                             __field(u32, seqno)
                             ),
 
@@ -414,11 +415,13 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_gem_request,
                                                i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
                           __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
                           __entry->ring = ring->id;
+                          __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
                           __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
                           ),
 
-           TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u",
-                     __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno)
+           TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u",
+                     __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
+                     __entry->seqno)
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
@@ -426,7 +429,7 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_add,
            TP_ARGS(req)
 );
 
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_complete,
+TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_notify,
            TP_PROTO(struct intel_engine_cs *ring),
            TP_ARGS(ring),
 
@@ -451,6 +454,11 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_retire,
            TP_ARGS(req)
 );
 
+DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_complete,
+           TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req),
+           TP_ARGS(req)
+);
+
 TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
            TP_PROTO(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req),
            TP_ARGS(req),
@@ -458,6 +466,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
            TP_STRUCT__entry(
                             __field(u32, dev)
                             __field(u32, ring)
+                            __field(u32, uniq)
                             __field(u32, seqno)
                             __field(bool, blocking)
                             ),
@@ -473,14 +482,15 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_gem_request_wait_begin,
                                                i915_gem_request_get_ring(req);
                           __entry->dev = ring->dev->primary->index;
                           __entry->ring = ring->id;
+                          __entry->uniq = req ? req->uniq : 0;
                           __entry->seqno = i915_gem_request_get_seqno(req);
                           __entry->blocking =
                                     mutex_is_locked(&ring->dev->struct_mutex);
                           ),
 
-           TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
-                     __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->seqno,
-                     __entry->blocking ?  "yes (NB)" : "no")
+           TP_printk("dev=%u, ring=%u, uniq=%u, seqno=%u, blocking=%s",
+                     __entry->dev, __entry->ring, __entry->uniq,
+                     __entry->seqno, __entry->blocking ?  "yes (NB)" : "no")
 );
 
 DEFINE_EVENT(i915_gem_request, i915_gem_request_wait_end,