Eric and David reported dead machines and traced it to commit
a195f004 ("sched: Fix load-balance lock-breaking"), it turns out
there's still a scenario where we can end up re-trying forever.
Since there is no strict forward progress guarantee in the
load-balance iteration we can get stuck re-retrying the same
task-set over and over.
Creating a forward progress guarantee with the existing
structure is somewhat non-trivial, for now simply terminate the
retry loop after a few tries.
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
[ logic cleanup as suggested by Eric ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1326297936.2442.157.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
}
#define LBF_ALL_PINNED 0x01
-#define LBF_NEED_BREAK 0x02
-#define LBF_ABORT 0x04
+#define LBF_NEED_BREAK 0x02 /* clears into HAD_BREAK */
+#define LBF_HAD_BREAK 0x04
+#define LBF_HAD_BREAKS 0x0C /* count HAD_BREAKs overflows into ABORT */
+#define LBF_ABORT 0x10
/*
* can_migrate_task - may task p from runqueue rq be migrated to this_cpu?
goto out_balanced;
if (lb_flags & LBF_NEED_BREAK) {
- lb_flags &= ~LBF_NEED_BREAK;
+ lb_flags += LBF_HAD_BREAK - LBF_NEED_BREAK;
+ if (lb_flags & LBF_ABORT)
+ goto out_balanced;
goto redo;
}