[PATCH] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4

      Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>

This construct is refused by GCC 4, so here's the (corrected) fix.  Thanks to
Russell for noticing a stupid mistake I did when first sending this.

As he noted, the code is largely suboptimal however it currently works, and
will be fixed shortly.  Just read the access_ok check on fp which is NULL, or
the pointer arithmetic below which should be done with a cast to void*:

 	frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
 		round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;

The code shows clearly that has been taken from
arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c:setup_rt_frame(), maybe in a bit of a hurry.

Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c
index 73a7926f73705d100809adc35b567cb0594cb712..8fdaed06c10dcce12aed363bb7abe32788d8e441 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/signal.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ int setup_signal_stack_si(unsigned long stack_top, int sig,
 
        frame = (struct rt_sigframe __user *)
                round_down(stack_top - sizeof(struct rt_sigframe), 16) - 8;
-       ((unsigned char *) frame) -= 128;
+        frame = (struct rt_sigframe *) ((unsigned long) frame - 128);
 
        if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, fp, sizeof(struct _fpstate)))
                goto out;