The argument names for hlist_add_after() are poorly chosen because they
look the same as the ones for hlist_add_before() but have to be used
differently.
hlist_add_after_rcu() has made a better choice.
Signed-off-by: Ken Helias <kenhelias@firemail.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
*(n->pprev) = n;
}
-static inline void hlist_add_after(struct hlist_node *n,
- struct hlist_node *next)
+static inline void hlist_add_after(struct hlist_node *prev,
+ struct hlist_node *n)
{
- next->next = n->next;
- n->next = next;
- next->pprev = &n->next;
+ n->next = prev->next;
+ prev->next = n;
+ n->pprev = &prev->next;
- if(next->next)
- next->next->pprev = &next->next;
+ if (n->next)
+ n->next->pprev = &n->next;
}
/* after that we'll appear to be on some hlist and hlist_del will work */