The notify function is a void function, yet the v4l2_subdev_notify
define uses it in a ? : construction, which causes sparse warnings.
Replace the define by a static inline function and move it to
v4l2-device.h, which is where it belongs since it needs to know the
v4l2_device struct. This wasn't a problem when it was a define, but
as a static inline function this no longer compiles in v4l2-subdev.h.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
int __must_check
v4l2_device_register_subdev_nodes(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev);
+/* Send a notification to v4l2_device. */
+static inline void v4l2_subdev_notify(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
+ unsigned int notification, void *arg)
+{
+ if (sd && sd->v4l2_dev && sd->v4l2_dev->notify)
+ sd->v4l2_dev->notify(sd, notification, arg);
+}
+
/* Iterate over all subdevs. */
#define v4l2_device_for_each_subdev(sd, v4l2_dev) \
list_for_each_entry(sd, &(v4l2_dev)->subdevs, list)
(!(sd) ? -ENODEV : (((sd)->ops->o && (sd)->ops->o->f) ? \
(sd)->ops->o->f((sd) , ##args) : -ENOIOCTLCMD))
-/* Send a notification to v4l2_device. */
-#define v4l2_subdev_notify(sd, notification, arg) \
- ((!(sd) || !(sd)->v4l2_dev || !(sd)->v4l2_dev->notify) ? -ENODEV : \
- (sd)->v4l2_dev->notify((sd), (notification), (arg)))
-
#define v4l2_subdev_has_op(sd, o, f) \
((sd)->ops->o && (sd)->ops->o->f)