It suits better, because the function also reads counter's data.
Also the 'print_interval' name will be used in following generalization
of counters display.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1435310967-14570-20-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
}
}
-static void print_interval(void)
+static void process_interval(void)
{
static int num_print_interval;
struct perf_evsel *counter;
if (interval) {
while (!waitpid(child_pid, &status, WNOHANG)) {
nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
- print_interval();
+ process_interval();
}
}
wait(&status);
while (!done) {
nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
if (interval)
- print_interval();
+ process_interval();
}
}