Static checkers complain that we should probably add curly braces
because, from the indenting, it looks like seq_printf() should be inside
the list_for_each_entry() loop. But the code is actually correct, it's
just the indenting which is off.
Besides fixing the indenting on seq_printf(), I did add curly braces,
because generally mult-line indents should have curly braces to make
them more readable.
The unintended indent was left behind and not unindented in
commit
d7f46fc4e7323887494db13f063a8e59861fefb0
Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Date: Fri Dec 6 14:10:55 2013 -0800
drm/i915: Make pin count per VMA
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : "");
if (obj->base.name)
seq_printf(m, " (name: %d)", obj->base.name);
- list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
if (vma->pin_count > 0)
pin_count++;
- seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
+ }
+ seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
if (obj->pin_display)
seq_printf(m, " (display)");
if (obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE)