Commit
27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency
decrease checking) removed the 10 point substraction when comparing the
load against down_threshold but did not remove the related limit for the
down_threshold value. As a result, down_threshold lower than 11 is not
allowed even though values from 1 to 10 do work correctly too. The
comment ("cannot be lower than 11 otherwise freq will not fall") also
does not apply after removing the substraction.
For this reason, allow down_threshold to take any value from 1 to 99
and fix the related comment.
Fixes:
27ed3cd2ebf4 (cpufreq: conservative: Fix the logic in frequency decrease checking)
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Wilczyński <twilczynski@naver.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
int ret;
ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &input);
- /* cannot be lower than 11 otherwise freq will not fall */
- if (ret != 1 || input < 11 || input > 100 ||
+ /* cannot be lower than 1 otherwise freq will not fall */
+ if (ret != 1 || input < 1 || input > 100 ||
input >= dbs_data->up_threshold)
return -EINVAL;