mei: consume flow control on the first chunk of writing

Consume the write flow control on the first chunk of the write instead
of on the buffer completion.
We can safely assume that the consequent chunks have the flow control
granted.

This addresses two issues:

1. Blocks other callbacks from the same client riding on the client's
flow control and prevents interleaving of messages as FW cannot distinguish
between two messages from the same client.

2. Fixes single buffer flow control arbitration in a clean way, without
connection/disconnection book keeping

Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/client.c b/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
index 36706705dfdccaed7a17eb297ad731f70dd64c35..ce88c2199b2c40209582cf57a436fd1b001492b9 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
@@ -755,9 +755,6 @@ void mei_cl_set_disconnected(struct mei_cl *cl)
        if (!WARN_ON(cl->me_cl->connect_count == 0))
                cl->me_cl->connect_count--;
 
-       if (cl->me_cl->connect_count == 0)
-               cl->me_cl->mei_flow_ctrl_creds = 0;
-
        mei_me_cl_put(cl->me_cl);
        cl->me_cl = NULL;
 }
@@ -1272,6 +1269,7 @@ int mei_cl_irq_write(struct mei_cl *cl, struct mei_cl_cb *cb,
        u32 msg_slots;
        int slots;
        int rets;
+       bool first_chunk;
 
        if (WARN_ON(!cl || !cl->dev))
                return -ENODEV;
@@ -1280,7 +1278,9 @@ int mei_cl_irq_write(struct mei_cl *cl, struct mei_cl_cb *cb,
 
        buf = &cb->buf;
 
-       rets = mei_cl_flow_ctrl_creds(cl);
+       first_chunk = cb->buf_idx == 0;
+
+       rets = first_chunk ? mei_cl_flow_ctrl_creds(cl) : 1;
        if (rets < 0)
                return rets;
 
@@ -1327,12 +1327,14 @@ int mei_cl_irq_write(struct mei_cl *cl, struct mei_cl_cb *cb,
        cb->buf_idx += mei_hdr.length;
        cb->completed = mei_hdr.msg_complete == 1;
 
-       if (mei_hdr.msg_complete) {
+       if (first_chunk) {
                if (mei_cl_flow_ctrl_reduce(cl))
                        return -EIO;
-               list_move_tail(&cb->list, &dev->write_waiting_list.list);
        }
 
+       if (mei_hdr.msg_complete)
+               list_move_tail(&cb->list, &dev->write_waiting_list.list);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1411,21 +1413,19 @@ int mei_cl_write(struct mei_cl *cl, struct mei_cl_cb *cb, bool blocking)
        if (rets)
                goto err;
 
+       rets = mei_cl_flow_ctrl_reduce(cl);
+       if (rets)
+               goto err;
+
        cl->writing_state = MEI_WRITING;
        cb->buf_idx = mei_hdr.length;
        cb->completed = mei_hdr.msg_complete == 1;
 
 out:
-       if (mei_hdr.msg_complete) {
-               rets = mei_cl_flow_ctrl_reduce(cl);
-               if (rets < 0)
-                       goto err;
-
+       if (mei_hdr.msg_complete)
                list_add_tail(&cb->list, &dev->write_waiting_list.list);
-       } else {
+       else
                list_add_tail(&cb->list, &dev->write_list.list);
-       }
-
 
        if (blocking && cl->writing_state != MEI_WRITE_COMPLETE) {