The math in both blk_stack_limits() and queue_limit_alignment_offset()
assume that a block device's io_min (aka minimum_io_size) is always a
power-of-2. Fix the math such that it works for non-power-of-2 io_min.
This issue (of alignment_offset != 0) became apparent when testing
dm-thinp with a thinp blocksize that matches a RAID6 stripesize of
1280K. Commit
fdfb4c8c1 ("dm thin: set minimum_io_size to pool's data
block size") unlocked the potential for alignment_offset != 0 due to
the dm-thin-pool's io_min possibly being a non-power-of-2.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
bottom = max(b->physical_block_size, b->io_min) + alignment;
/* Verify that top and bottom intervals line up */
- if (max(top, bottom) & (min(top, bottom) - 1)) {
+ if (max(top, bottom) % min(top, bottom)) {
t->misaligned = 1;
ret = -1;
}
/* Find lowest common alignment_offset */
t->alignment_offset = lcm(t->alignment_offset, alignment)
- & (max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min) - 1);
+ % max(t->physical_block_size, t->io_min);
/* Verify that new alignment_offset is on a logical block boundary */
if (t->alignment_offset & (t->logical_block_size - 1)) {
static inline int queue_limit_alignment_offset(struct queue_limits *lim, sector_t sector)
{
unsigned int granularity = max(lim->physical_block_size, lim->io_min);
- unsigned int alignment = (sector << 9) & (granularity - 1);
+ unsigned int alignment = sector_div(sector, granularity >> 9) << 9;
- return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment)
- & (granularity - 1);
+ return (granularity + lim->alignment_offset - alignment) % granularity;
}
static inline int bdev_alignment_offset(struct block_device *bdev)