perf record -b -g <command>
perf report --branch-history
This merges the LBRs with the callgraphs.
However it would be nice if it also works without callgraphs (-g) set in
perf record, so that only the LBRs are displayed. But currently perf
report errors in this case. For example,
perf record -b <command>
perf report --branch-history
Error:
Selected -g or --branch-history but no callchain data. Did
you call 'perf record' without -g?
This patch displays the LBRs only even if callgraphs(-g) is not enabled
in perf record.
Change log:
v2: According to Milian Wolff's comment, change the obsolete error
message. Now the error message is:
┌─Error:─────────────────────────────────────┐
│Selected -g or --branch-history. │
│But no callchain or branch data. │
│Did you call 'perf record' without -g or -b?│
│ │
│ │
│Press any key... │
└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When passing the last parameter to hists__fprintf,
changes "|" to "||".
hists__fprintf(hists, !quiet, 0, 0, rep->min_percent, stdout,
symbol_conf.use_callchain || symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count);
Signed-off-by: Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1494240182-28899-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
"'perf record' without -g?\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (symbol_conf.use_callchain) {
- ui__error("Selected -g or --branch-history but no "
- "callchain data. Did\n"
- "you call 'perf record' without -g?\n");
+ if (symbol_conf.use_callchain &&
+ !symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count) {
+ ui__error("Selected -g or --branch-history.\n"
+ "But no callchain or branch data.\n"
+ "Did you call 'perf record' without -g or -b?\n");
return -1;
}
} else if (!callchain_param.enabled &&
hists__fprintf_nr_sample_events(hists, rep, evname, stdout);
hists__fprintf(hists, !quiet, 0, 0, rep->min_percent, stdout,
- symbol_conf.use_callchain);
+ symbol_conf.use_callchain ||
+ symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count);
fprintf(stdout, "\n\n");
}
struct perf_evsel *evsel, struct addr_location *al,
int max_stack)
{
- if (sample->callchain == NULL)
+ if (sample->callchain == NULL && !symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count)
return 0;
if (symbol_conf.use_callchain || symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain ||
- perf_hpp_list.parent) {
+ perf_hpp_list.parent || symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count) {
return thread__resolve_callchain(al->thread, cursor, evsel, sample,
parent, al, max_stack);
}
int hist_entry__append_callchain(struct hist_entry *he, struct perf_sample *sample)
{
- if (!symbol_conf.use_callchain || sample->callchain == NULL)
+ if ((!symbol_conf.use_callchain || sample->callchain == NULL) &&
+ !symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count)
return 0;
return callchain_append(he->callchain, &callchain_cursor, sample->period);
}
else
use_callchain = symbol_conf.use_callchain;
+ use_callchain |= symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count;
+
output_resort(evsel__hists(evsel), prog, use_callchain, NULL);
}
{
struct branch_stack *branch = sample->branch_stack;
struct ip_callchain *chain = sample->callchain;
- int chain_nr = chain->nr;
+ int chain_nr = 0;
u8 cpumode = PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
int i, j, err, nr_entries;
int skip_idx = -1;
int first_call = 0;
int nr_loop_iter;
+ if (chain)
+ chain_nr = chain->nr;
+
if (perf_evsel__has_branch_callstack(evsel)) {
err = resolve_lbr_callchain_sample(thread, cursor, sample, parent,
root_al, max_stack);
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
be[i] = branch->entries[i];
+
+ if (chain == NULL)
+ continue;
+
/*
* Check for overlap into the callchain.
* The return address is one off compared to
if (err)
return err;
}
+
+ if (chain_nr == 0)
+ return 0;
+
chain_nr -= nr;
}