if (...) BUG(); should be replaced with BUG_ON(...) when the test has no
side-effects to allow a definition of BUG_ON that drops the code completely.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@ disable unlikely @ expression E,f; @@
(
if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); }
|
- if (unlikely(E)) { BUG(); }
+ BUG_ON(E);
)
@@ expression E,f; @@
(
if (<... f(...) ...>) { BUG(); }
|
- if (E) { BUG(); }
+ BUG_ON(E);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
BUG_ON(!next_free);
/* The tree code before us didn't allow enough room in the leaf. */
- if (el->l_next_free_rec == el->l_count && !has_empty)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(el->l_next_free_rec == el->l_count && !has_empty);
/*
* The easiest way to approach this is to just remove the
mlog_entry_void();
- if (!journal)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON(!journal);
osb = journal->j_osb;