locking/rtmutex: Optimize setting task running after being blocked
authorDavidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Mon, 2 Feb 2015 06:16:24 +0000 (22:16 -0800)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:57:42 +0000 (07:57 +0100)
We explicitly mark the task running after returning from
a __rt_mutex_slowlock() call, which does the actual sleeping
via wait-wake-trylocking. As such, this patch does two things:

(1) refactors the code so that setting current to TASK_RUNNING
    is done by __rt_mutex_slowlock(), and not by the callers. The
    downside to this is that it becomes a bit unclear when at what
    point we block. As such I've added a comment that the task
    blocks when calling __rt_mutex_slowlock() so readers can figure
    out when it is running again.

(2) relaxes setting current's state through __set_current_state(),
    instead of it's more expensive barrier alternative. There was no
    need for the implied barrier as we're obviously not planning on
    blocking.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422857784.18096.1.camel@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c

index 7c98873a30777f131541a36889631c1efea79320..3059bc2f022daa6e4d8d976c39a7d8a8f546d813 100644 (file)
@@ -1130,6 +1130,7 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
                set_current_state(state);
        }
 
+       __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
        return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1188,10 +1189,9 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
        ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
 
        if (likely(!ret))
+               /* sleep on the mutex */
                ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
 
-       set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
        if (unlikely(ret)) {
                remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
                rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
@@ -1626,10 +1626,9 @@ int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 
        set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 
+       /* sleep on the mutex */
        ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
 
-       set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
        if (unlikely(ret))
                remove_waiter(lock, waiter);