The NULL checking here doesn't make sense, so it causes a static checker
warning. It turns out that p->mm can't be NULL so the inconsistency is
harmless and we should just remove the check.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
if (!p)
continue;
- if (task_lmk_waiting(p) && p->mm &&
+ if (task_lmk_waiting(p) &&
time_before_eq(jiffies, lowmem_deathpending_timeout)) {
task_unlock(p);
rcu_read_unlock();