bqt->tag_index[tag] = NULL;
- /*
- * We use test_and_clear_bit's memory ordering properties here.
- * The tag_map bit acts as a lock for tag_index[bit], so we need
- * a barrer before clearing the bit (precisely: release semantics).
- * Could use clear_bit_unlock when it is merged.
- */
- if (unlikely(!test_and_clear_bit(tag, bqt->tag_map))) {
+ if (unlikely(!test_bit(tag, bqt->tag_map))) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: attempt to clear non-busy tag (%d)\n",
__FUNCTION__, tag);
return;
}
-
+ /*
+ * The tag_map bit acts as a lock for tag_index[bit], so we need
+ * unlock memory barrier semantics.
+ */
+ clear_bit_unlock(tag, bqt->tag_map);
bqt->busy--;
}
if (tag >= bqt->max_depth)
return 1;
- } while (test_and_set_bit(tag, bqt->tag_map));
+ } while (test_and_set_bit_lock(tag, bqt->tag_map));
/*
- * We rely on test_and_set_bit providing lock memory ordering semantics
- * (could use test_and_set_bit_lock when it is merged).
+ * We need lock ordering semantics given by test_and_set_bit_lock.
+ * See blk_queue_end_tag for details.
*/
rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_QUEUED;