proc/sysctl: Don't grab i_lock under sysctl_lock.

Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> This patch has locking problem. I've got lockdep splat under LTP.
>
> [ 6633.115456] ======================================================
> [ 6633.115502] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [ 6633.115553] 4.9.10-debug+ #9 Tainted: G             L
> [ 6633.115584] -------------------------------------------------------
> [ 6633.115627] ksm02/284980 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 6633.115659]  (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#4){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff816bc1ce>] igrab+0x1e/0x80
> [ 6633.115834] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 6633.115882]  (sysctl_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff817e379b>] unregister_sysctl_table+0x6b/0x110
> [ 6633.116026] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [ 6633.116026]
> [ 6633.116080]
> [ 6633.116080] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [ 6633.116117]
> -> #2 (sysctl_lock){+.+...}:
> -> #1 (&(&dentry->d_lockref.lock)->rlock){+.+...}:
> -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#4){+.+...}:
>
> d_lock nests inside i_lock
> sysctl_lock nests inside d_lock in d_compare
>
> This patch adds i_lock nesting inside sysctl_lock.

Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> replied:
> Once ->unregistering is set, you can drop sysctl_lock just fine.  So I'd
> try something like this - use rcu_read_lock() in proc_sys_prune_dcache(),
> drop sysctl_lock() before it and regain after.  Make sure that no inodes
> are added to the list ones ->unregistering has been set and use RCU list
> primitives for modifying the inode list, with sysctl_lock still used to
> serialize its modifications.
>
> Freeing struct inode is RCU-delayed (see proc_destroy_inode()), so doing
> igrab() is safe there.  Since we don't drop inode reference until after we'd
> passed beyond it in the list, list_for_each_entry_rcu() should be fine.

I agree with Al Viro's analsysis of the situtation.

Fixes: d6cffbbe9a7e ("proc/sysctl: prune stale dentries during unregistering")
Reported-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Tested-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index 8efb1e10b0251f485f753c157ba1031a32b84ea9..3e64c6502dc8540c8b71959ed1aca1dbd9c8ace7 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -266,21 +266,19 @@ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head)
        struct inode *inode, *prev = NULL;
        struct proc_inode *ei;
 
-       list_for_each_entry(ei, &head->inodes, sysctl_inodes) {
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(ei, &head->inodes, sysctl_inodes) {
                inode = igrab(&ei->vfs_inode);
                if (inode) {
-                       spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
+                       rcu_read_unlock();
                        iput(prev);
                        prev = inode;
                        d_prune_aliases(inode);
-                       spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
+                       rcu_read_lock();
                }
        }
-       if (prev) {
-               spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
-               iput(prev);
-               spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
-       }
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       iput(prev);
 }
 
 /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */
@@ -296,10 +294,10 @@ static void start_unregistering(struct ctl_table_header *p)
                p->unregistering = &wait;
                spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
                wait_for_completion(&wait);
-               spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
        } else {
                /* anything non-NULL; we'll never dereference it */
                p->unregistering = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+               spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
        }
        /*
         * Prune dentries for unregistered sysctls: namespaced sysctls
@@ -310,6 +308,7 @@ static void start_unregistering(struct ctl_table_header *p)
         * do not remove from the list until nobody holds it; walking the
         * list in do_sysctl() relies on that.
         */
+       spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
        erase_header(p);
 }
 
@@ -455,11 +454,17 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb,
        inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
 
        ei = PROC_I(inode);
-       ei->sysctl = head;
-       ei->sysctl_entry = table;
 
        spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
-       list_add(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes);
+       if (unlikely(head->unregistering)) {
+               spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
+               iput(inode);
+               inode = NULL;
+               goto out;
+       }
+       ei->sysctl = head;
+       ei->sysctl_entry = table;
+       list_add_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes);
        head->count++;
        spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
 
@@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ out:
 void proc_sys_evict_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ctl_table_header *head)
 {
        spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
-       list_del(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes);
+       list_del_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes);
        if (!--head->count)
                kfree_rcu(head, rcu);
        spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);