!ep->esb_stat is either 1 or 0, and the rightmost bit of ESB_ST_COMPLETE is
always 0, making the result of !ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE always 0.
Thus parentheses around the argument to ! seem needed.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
!E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
ep->destructor(&ep->seq, ep->arg);
if (ep->lp->tt.exch_put)
ep->lp->tt.exch_put(ep->lp, mp, ep->xid);
- WARN_ON(!ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE);
+ WARN_ON(!(ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE));
mempool_free(ep, mp->ep_pool);
}
}