This patch closes the following race:
We get a PM interrupt A, mask it, set dev_priv->iir = PM_A and kick of the
work item. Scheduler isn't grumpy, so the work queue takes rps_lock,
grabs pm_iir = dev_priv->pm_iir and pm_imr = READ(PMIMR). Note that
pm_imr == pm_iir because we've just masked the interrupt we've got.
Now hw sends out PM interrupt B (not masked), we process it and mask
it. Later on the irq handler also clears PMIIR.
Then the work item proceeds and at the end clears PMIMR. Because
(local) pm_imr == pm_iir we have
pm_imr & ~pm_iir == 0
so all interrupts are enabled.
Hardware is still interrupt-happy, and sends out a new PM interrupt B.
PMIMR doesn't mask B (it does not mask anything), PMIIR is cleared, so
we get it and hit the WARN in the interrupt handler (because
dev_priv->pm_iir == PM_B).
That's why I've moved the
WRITE(PMIMR, 0)
up under the protection of the rps_lock. And write an uncoditional 0
to PMIMR, because that's what we'll do anyway.
This races looks much more likely because we can arbitrarily extend
the window by grabing dev->struct mutex right after the irq handler
has processed the first PM_B interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
pm_iir = dev_priv->pm_iir;
dev_priv->pm_iir = 0;
pm_imr = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIMR);
+ I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0);
spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps_lock);
if (!pm_iir)
* an *extremely* unlikely race with gen6_rps_enable() that is prevented
* by holding struct_mutex for the duration of the write.
*/
- I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, pm_imr & ~pm_iir);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex);
}