oom: move OOM_DISABLE check from oom_kill_task to out_of_memory()
authorKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:19:38 +0000 (17:19 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:45:01 +0000 (20:45 -0700)
Presently if oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled and current have
OOM_DISABLED, following printk in oom_kill_process is called twice.

    pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %lu or sacrifice child\n",
            message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);

So, OOM_DISABLE check should be more early.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
mm/oom_kill.c

index 011181ed41e3b44fa5f59e9a736b3ce43f53c9ee..79b34831ad79c9d061b3a17a6e3dc2dd8cf9aad4 100644 (file)
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
 static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
 {
        p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
-       if (!p || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE) {
+       if (!p) {
                task_unlock(p);
                return 1;
        }
@@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 
        read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
        if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
-           !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask)) {
+           !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask) &&
+           (current->signal->oom_adj != OOM_DISABLE)) {
                /*
                 * oom_kill_process() needs tasklist_lock held.  If it returns
                 * non-zero, current could not be killed so we must fallback to