Presently if oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled and current have
OOM_DISABLED, following printk in oom_kill_process is called twice.
pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %lu or sacrifice child\n",
message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points);
So, OOM_DISABLE check should be more early.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
- if (!p || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE) {
+ if (!p) {
task_unlock(p);
return 1;
}
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task &&
- !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask)) {
+ !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask) &&
+ (current->signal->oom_adj != OOM_DISABLE)) {
/*
* oom_kill_process() needs tasklist_lock held. If it returns
* non-zero, current could not be killed so we must fallback to