We currently update the 'next' variable only with a single step value.
But it's possible the 'adv' update is bigger than single 'step' value.
This would leave 'next' value under counted and force unnecessary
ui_progress__ops->update calls.
Calculate the amount of steps we need for 'adv' update and increase the
'next' with that amounts of steps.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170908120510.22515-3-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include "../cache.h"
#include "progress.h"
void ui_progress__update(struct ui_progress *p, u64 adv)
{
+ u64 last = p->curr;
+
p->curr += adv;
if (p->curr >= p->next) {
- p->next += p->step;
+ u64 nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(p->curr - last, p->step);
+
+ p->next += nr * p->step;
ui_progress__ops->update(p);
}
}