drbd: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail

Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail().

spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem.
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>

diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
index eeda8b8e9d8e49bd407867b872b8c776d7ba5130..377f27bbba1782e678d43737803025e52bb1623f 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
@@ -134,8 +134,7 @@ static void drbd_endio_write_sec_final(struct drbd_peer_request *peer_req) __rel
 
        spin_lock_irqsave(&mdev->tconn->req_lock, flags);
        mdev->writ_cnt += peer_req->i.size >> 9;
-       list_del(&peer_req->w.list); /* has been on active_ee or sync_ee */
-       list_add_tail(&peer_req->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
+       list_move_tail(&peer_req->w.list, &mdev->done_ee);
 
        /*
         * Do not remove from the write_requests tree here: we did not send the