The current tail breaks the pattern of if (check) return false, which
can catch the reader out. If we move the gen2/3 power-of-two test into
the earlier gen2/3 branch, we can eliminate the contrary tail.
Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170203115036.24743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
if (stride > 8192)
return false;
+ if (!is_power_of_2(stride))
+ return false;
+
if (IS_GEN3(i915)) {
if (obj->base.size > I830_FENCE_MAX_SIZE_VAL << 20)
return false;
if (!stride || !IS_ALIGNED(stride, tile_width))
return false;
- /* 965+ just needs multiples of tile width */
- if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 4)
- return true;
-
- /* Pre-965 needs power of two tile widths */
- return is_power_of_2(stride);
+ return true;
}
static bool i915_vma_fence_prepare(struct i915_vma *vma,