Fixed coding style issues where kernel types u16,u64,u32 should
be preferred over uint16_t,uint64_t,uint32_t
Signed-off-by: Nayeemahmed Badebade <itachi.opsrc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
static int get_dprc_icid(struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io,
int container_id, uint16_t *icid)
{
- uint16_t dprc_handle;
+ u16 dprc_handle;
struct dprc_attributes attr;
int error;
return error;
}
-static int translate_mc_addr(uint64_t mc_addr, phys_addr_t *phys_addr)
+static int translate_mc_addr(u64 mc_addr, phys_addr_t *phys_addr)
{
int i;
struct fsl_mc *mc = dev_get_drvdata(fsl_mc_bus_type.dev_root->parent);
struct fsl_mc_io *mc_io = NULL;
int container_id;
phys_addr_t mc_portal_phys_addr;
- uint32_t mc_portal_size;
+ u32 mc_portal_size;
struct mc_version mc_version;
struct resource res;