Currently we claim that omap4-panda and omap4-panda-es are essentially
the same, but they are not since PandaBoard-ES uses OMAP4460 and
PandaBoard uses OMAP4430.
So, split the common definition and make the model name available.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
#include "elpida_ecb240abacn.dtsi"
/ {
- model = "TI OMAP4 PandaBoard";
- compatible = "ti,omap4-panda", "ti,omap4430", "ti,omap4";
-
memory {
device_type = "memory";
reg = <0x80000000 0x40000000>; /* 1 GB */
#include "omap4460.dtsi"
#include "omap4-panda-common.dtsi"
+/ {
+ model = "TI OMAP4 PandaBoard-ES";
+ compatible = "ti,omap4-panda-es", "ti,omap4-panda", "ti,omap4460", "ti,omap4430", "ti,omap4";
+};
+
/* Audio routing is differnet between PandaBoard4430 and PandaBoardES */
&sound {
ti,model = "PandaBoardES";
#include "omap443x.dtsi"
#include "omap4-panda-common.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "TI OMAP4 PandaBoard";
+ compatible = "ti,omap4-panda", "ti,omap4430", "ti,omap4";
+};