bad_inode: add ->rename2()
authorMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:15:31 +0000 (15:15 +0200)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Thu, 7 Aug 2014 18:40:09 +0000 (14:40 -0400)
so we return -EIO instead of -EINVAL.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
fs/bad_inode.c

index 7c93953030fbe5eda13d76b6a8c53d6f2a31902d..afd2b4408adf53d78c716043c847ba48cf5c3bef 100644 (file)
@@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ static int bad_inode_mknod (struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
        return -EIO;
 }
 
-static int bad_inode_rename (struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
-               struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry)
+static int bad_inode_rename2(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
+                            struct inode *new_dir, struct dentry *new_dentry,
+                            unsigned int flags)
 {
        return -EIO;
 }
@@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static const struct inode_operations bad_inode_ops =
        .mkdir          = bad_inode_mkdir,
        .rmdir          = bad_inode_rmdir,
        .mknod          = bad_inode_mknod,
-       .rename         = bad_inode_rename,
+       .rename2        = bad_inode_rename2,
        .readlink       = bad_inode_readlink,
        /* follow_link must be no-op, otherwise unmounting this inode
           won't work */