commit
4be173813e57c7298103a83155c2391b5b167b4c
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Jun 6 10:22:29 2014 +0100
drm/i915: Reorder semaphore deadlock check
did the majority of the work, but it missed one crucial detail:
The check for the unkickable deadlock on this ring must come after the
check whether the ring that we are waiting on has already passed its
target seqno.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80709
Tested-by: Stefan Huber <shuber@sthu.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
struct intel_engine_cs *signaller;
- u32 seqno, ctl;
+ u32 seqno;
ring->hangcheck.deadlock++;
if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock >= I915_NUM_RINGS)
return -1;
- /* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
- ctl = I915_READ_CTL(signaller);
- if (ctl & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE && semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
- return -1;
-
if (i915_seqno_passed(signaller->get_seqno(signaller, false), seqno))
return 1;
- if (signaller->hangcheck.deadlock)
+ /* cursory check for an unkickable deadlock */
+ if (I915_READ_CTL(signaller) & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE &&
+ semaphore_passed(signaller) < 0)
return -1;
return 0;