return err;
}
+static int sdcardfs_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+ struct file *file, *lower_file;
+ const struct vm_operations_struct *lower_vm_ops;
+ struct vm_area_struct lower_vma;
+
+ memcpy(&lower_vma, vma, sizeof(struct vm_area_struct));
+ file = lower_vma.vm_file;
+ lower_vm_ops = SDCARDFS_F(file)->lower_vm_ops;
+ BUG_ON(!lower_vm_ops);
+ if (!lower_vm_ops->page_mkwrite)
+ goto out;
+
+ lower_file = sdcardfs_lower_file(file);
+ /*
+ * XXX: vm_ops->page_mkwrite may be called in parallel.
+ * Because we have to resort to temporarily changing the
+ * vma->vm_file to point to the lower file, a concurrent
+ * invocation of sdcardfs_page_mkwrite could see a different
+ * value. In this workaround, we keep a different copy of the
+ * vma structure in our stack, so we never expose a different
+ * value of the vma->vm_file called to us, even temporarily.
+ * A better fix would be to change the calling semantics of
+ * ->page_mkwrite to take an explicit file pointer.
+ */
+ lower_vma.vm_file = lower_file;
+ err = lower_vm_ops->page_mkwrite(&lower_vma, vmf);
+out:
+ return err;
+}
+
static ssize_t sdcardfs_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
const struct iovec *iov, loff_t offset,
unsigned long nr_segs)
const struct vm_operations_struct sdcardfs_vm_ops = {
.fault = sdcardfs_fault,
+ .page_mkwrite = sdcardfs_page_mkwrite,
};