On a 4-socket Brickland system, hot-removing one ioapic is fine.
Hot-removing the 2nd one causes panic in mp_unregister_ioapic()
while calling release_resource().
It is because the iomem_res pointer has already been released
when removing the first ioapic.
To explain the use of &res[num] here: res is assigned to ioapic_resources,
and later in ioapic_insert_resources() we do:
struct resource *r = ioapic_resources;
for_each_ioapic(i) {
insert_resource(&iomem_resource, r);
r++;
}
Here 'r' is treated as an arry of 'struct resource', and the r++ ensures
that each element of the array is inserted separately. Thus we should call
release_resouce() on each element at &res[num].
Fix it by assigning the correct pointers to ioapics[i].iomem_res in
ioapic_setup_resources().
Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465369193-4816-3-git-send-email-rui.y.wang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
res[num].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
snprintf(mem, IOAPIC_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE, "IOAPIC %u", i);
mem += IOAPIC_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE;
+ ioapics[i].iomem_res = &res[num];
num++;
- ioapics[i].iomem_res = res;
}
ioapic_resources = res;