There are two motivations for this:
1. It improves readability to my eyes
2. Using nested min() calls results in a shadowed _min1 variable,
which is a bit untidy. Sparse complained about this.
I have also replaced (size_t)64 with a variable of type size_t and value 64.
This also improves readability to my eyes.
Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
const char *callid, size_t callid_len,
int *idx)
{
- size_t len = min(min(callid_len, (size_t)64), buf_len - *idx - 1);
+ size_t max_len = 64;
+ size_t len = min3(max_len, callid_len, buf_len - *idx - 1);
memcpy(buf + *idx, callid, len);
buf[*idx+len] = '\0';
*idx += len + 1;