Rounding to the closest kHz seems like the better option that round
down or up when computing the alternate clock for CEA/HDMI modes.
It'll give us a slightly more accurate clock in some cases.
Not sure why I went for the down+up approach originally. Perhaps
I was thinking we can go back and forth betwen the two frequencies
without introducing errors, but round to closest still maintains
that property.
Cc: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Libin Yang <libin.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
* and the 60Hz variant otherwise.
*/
if (cea_mode->vdisplay == 240 || cea_mode->vdisplay == 480)
- clock = clock * 1001 / 1000;
+ clock = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clock * 1001, 1000);
else
- clock = DIV_ROUND_UP(clock * 1000, 1001);
+ clock = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clock * 1000, 1001);
return clock;
}