Initialize data_index where appropriate to improve readability and
assist debugging. This change doesn't affect driver behaviour.
I prefer to see
current_req->data[data_index++]
in place of
current_req->data[0]
or
current_req->data[1]
inasmuchas it becomes obvious what the data_index variable does.
Moreover, the actual value of data_index when examined at any given moment
tells me something about prior events, which did prove helpful.
Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
/* assert cuda_state == idle */
if (current_req == NULL)
return;
+ data_index = 0;
if (TREQ_asserted(in_8(&via[B])))
return; /* a byte is coming in from the CUDA */
/* set the shift register to shift out and send a byte */
out_8(&via[ACR], in_8(&via[ACR]) | SR_OUT);
- out_8(&via[SR], current_req->data[0]);
+ out_8(&via[SR], current_req->data[data_index++]);
assert_TIP();
cuda_state = sent_first_byte;
}
negate_TIP_and_TACK();
cuda_state = idle;
} else {
- out_8(&via[SR], current_req->data[1]);
+ out_8(&via[SR], current_req->data[data_index++]);
toggle_TACK();
- data_index = 2;
cuda_state = sending;
}
break;